Thursday, 28 May 2015
Thursday, 21 May 2015
Calendar Constipation
We’re
experiencing a peculiar form of constipation caused by having too much to do
and not being able to do any of it. Quite uncomfortable !
With less
than a week to splash-down, the boatyard has to finish the electronics, put up
sails, run the lines in the mast and boom, install some cleats, tighten and
tune the rigging, prepare the anchor and chain, and add some hardware for my
boom break. There’s nothing we can do to
speed up the process, although we bug them with telephone calls or impromptu visits
every day whilst trying to stay out of the way so they can do their work.
The good
news is that Patrick found a Rocna anchor in France after being told that ours
wouldn’t arrive until after August. We also began commissioning the new Yamaha outboard
motor by running it for an hour in our special homemade “outboard test tank”.
![]() |
| New outboard motor, or new trash-can punch mixer ? |
In the
meantime, we’re making / revising / losing / remaking lists of things to do,
packing, trying to get the yard ready for 6 months of abandonment, and scouring
the camping stores for those all-important cruising items: a 12 volt wet-dry handy vac (hand vacuum
cleaner) and a stove-top toaster.
We’re also
trying to get organized for a 6-month departure 24 hours after the boat is in
the water. This is called calendar
diarrhea and typically follows calendar constipation. We aren’t going to head off for wilds unknown
with a new boat, but we are planning on casting off and turning circles in our
bay until we feel comfortable enough to start our trek north. There are a lot of new gadgets on the boat to
come to grips with, including the swing keel, the Code D sail, and a “German”
mainsheet system where the genoa and mainsheet downhaul share the same winch in
front of each helm station. We’re told
that we’ll love this system once we get used to it, but I’m still trying to
figure out the choreography required for gybing.
We are
supposed to be in St Malo by the 2nd of July for our niece’s
wedding, but Patrick has agreed that if we feel too rushed, we’ll just leave
the boat wherever we happened to be and try to get to the wedding by train or
bus. I *hate* calendars of any sort when
cruising.
Friday, 15 May 2015
Cockpit Updates
The dodger, bimini, and arch are in place ! With one week left to go, the final installations are coming together. I'm still not convinced that it will all be done on time (electronics, sails, solar panels, etc) but the progress is impressive nonetheless.
Every time we walk away from the boat, Patrick just shakes his head and says, "Wow, it's big. Really big. And WIDE." Mareda is only 1.24 meters longer than Spray but that's enough to make us a bit anxious about handling her. I keep reminding him that Mareda has the same sail area as Spray and weighs 3 tonnes more, so she should be much more docile than Spray was. Still, the first time out with Mareda is going to be nerve-racking ! (*fact check*: The genoa on Spray is the same size as Mareda's, but Mareda's mainsail is 35 m2 while Spray's is 27 m2. That'll give us some extra push for those extra 3 tonnes.)
Every time we walk away from the boat, Patrick just shakes his head and says, "Wow, it's big. Really big. And WIDE." Mareda is only 1.24 meters longer than Spray but that's enough to make us a bit anxious about handling her. I keep reminding him that Mareda has the same sail area as Spray and weighs 3 tonnes more, so she should be much more docile than Spray was. Still, the first time out with Mareda is going to be nerve-racking ! (*fact check*: The genoa on Spray is the same size as Mareda's, but Mareda's mainsail is 35 m2 while Spray's is 27 m2. That'll give us some extra push for those extra 3 tonnes.)
Thursday, 14 May 2015
Ode to my new hose
Patrick
thinks I have an abnormal, possibly psycho-sexual fixation over our new boat
hose. But he does admit that it’s pretty
dang nifty.
A normal 25
meter boat hose is a robust type of garden hose rolled up on a spool in a
plastic case. It’s heavy, takes up a lot
of space, and costs about $100. As we
browsed the boating, camping, and gardening stores looking for alternatives, we
stumbled upon the Pocket Hose Ultra II:
30 meters of light-weight compact hose that (they say) is exceptionally robust. The casing is a type of nylon / teflon
textile made to resist abrasion and UV rays.
The interior is a sort of plastic webbing that shrinks when not under
pressure and expands as the water enters.
It’s springy like a bungee cord.
I put it to
the test this afternoon and was thrilled with it. (Patrick says “overly thrilled.”) I was worried that it wouldn't shrink back
down after inflating, but it did. Okay,
it’s true, I couldn't get it back in the original
box, but I had a handy mesh bag laying around that was just the perfect size
for it.
![]() |
| Inflated |
![]() |
| Deflated ! |
![]() |
| And in the bag ... |
Did I mention it’s light? I can hold it up with 1 finger ! I also didn't measure it to make sure it
extended to the full 30 meters, but the little section I held in my hand
expanded at least 3 times its length.
All this for $65. I’ll let you
know how it fares over the next few months as we put it to the real test.
And while I
was making an inventory of all our equipment, I realized with horror that we
were missing two essential elements for any adventure involving mechanical
parts: WD-40 and Duct Tape ! Yikes !! Back to the store…
Wednesday, 13 May 2015
Departure Looms
The launch
date has been set, lists have been made to organize every waking minute of our last
days, and mounds of equipment are piled up in the garage waiting to find their
place on Mareda.
The reality
of it all hit me this morning as I looked up the times for the bridge openings
to leave Vannes. And then what? Where will we spend our first day sailing,
our first night on Mareda? Should we
head to one of our favorite hide-away anchorages in the gulf, or should we go
directly to a port in case we discover some problem?
We’ll need
some space and calm for the commissioning process: getting to know the ropes (literally), how to
use the swing keel, the electronics, the navigation systems, calibrating the
anemometer and the depth sounder, swinging the compass, christening the boat
and imploring Neptune to grant us safe passage in his realm. The last time we did this, we have to first "de-name" the boat, then request a new name from Neptune, and then, in the interest of Franco-American cooperation, cut the magical serpent that followed in our wake. With so many rituals and potential for error, it's hard to know if we did everything right. This time should be much simpler.
Then there
are the more subtle processes of getting to know a new boat: calibrating my own internal sensors to
distinguish the normal noises from strange ones, and understanding her
movements and reactions to swell and tide, particular to each boat. With Spray, I could wake up from a sound
sleep as she began to shift slightly with the slack tide. A quick look at the clock would confirm my
internal one. I don’t remember how long
it took to establish that link, but I do remember quite a few nights of hashed
sleep. Patrick remembers them, too,
although not so fondly. I would bound
out of bed to check the hour, the tide tables, and have a look around on the
deck to see how the boat was swinging on the anchor or mooring buoy. He would wake up with a start. “What’s happening?!” After a few nights, the only thing his
internal sensors needed to tell him was that his wife was up to her nightly antics.
He quickly learned to just sleep through
it all, knowing I would wake him up if ever there was a real need.
Enough
procrastination for one day… the garage awaits ! 10 days left till splashdown !
Saturday, 9 May 2015
Farewell Spray
Spray has
been sold. No exclamation points, no champagne
corks flying. There is a saying that a
boat owner only knows two days of joy: the day he buys the boat and the
day he sells it. It’s just not
true.
It’s not
that I’m overly sentimental about Spray.
In fact, I just don’t feel much of anything except relief that the
process of selling her is over and a lingering sense of responsibility
to hand her over to her new owners in good condition.
In a rare
moment of sitting idly over coffee this morning, Patrick and I reminisced about
all our adventures with Spray. While we
are thrilled at the prospect of a new boat, we realize how important it was for
our education to start out with an old boat.
After 3 years and nearly 4500 miles under the keel, there’s not much about
basic boat maintenance that we don’t know how to handle now. Electricity, plumbing, diesel engine
maintenance, mystery leaks, epoxies and general repairs of all sorts no longer
frighten us the way they did in the beginning.
If we’d had a new boat from the beginning, I dare say we’d still be
anxious about our ability to manage a boat.
That said,
we fully intend to savor our graduation from “Boat Maintenance School” and
enjoy the relative pleasures of sailing a new boat where repairs should be
minimal. (Remind me I said that in a few
months…).
Spray by
numbers:
Bought:
June 2012 Sold: May 2015
4450
nautical miles in 2.5 years of sailing from the Channel Islands to the
northwest tip of Spain.
264 days
sailing (5 over-night sails)
3 countries
visited (France, England, Spain)
Euros
invested in upgrades and maintenance: way too many !
Cost of a solid
education in boats, a sense of accomplishment, and the strong desire to continue the
sailing life: priceless.
Tuesday, 28 April 2015
Toilet Talk: How to Change a Toilet Valve and Thru-Hull Fitting
A mere 48
hours before Spray was to undergo a 6-hour inspection and put into the water,
we discovered that the toilet evacuation valve was stuck.
In English:
stuck but good. In French: stuck from
Chez Stuck.
It was
stuck last year, too, so tried the same things that worked the last time: WD-40, a hammer, cleaning with long tube brush, and vinegar. But this time it didn't work. Web forums suggested progressively aggressive
chemical treatments: vinegar first, then Coca Cola (note: apparently Lite and
Zero are no good for this), and if all else fails, hydrochloric acid
(10%). We tried the Coke, I’m
embarrassed to say, and decided that the acid was just over the top. It was time to admit defeat and change the
valve.
The first
challenge was to remove the old valve without damaging the thru-hull fitting. Sub-challenge 1: procure appropriate tools. The local mechanics
loaned Patrick a manly man’s wrench, and I loaned him my hairdryer. Both were essential to unscrew the first
locking ring and tug off the hose. The
real test was trying to get the valve assembly off the thru-hull. After about 15 minutes of grunting and
sweating with both the wrench and hairdryer, it gave way. All of it.
Thru-hull included.
After an animated debate about how to proceed, we agreed (read: I won) that we shouldn't mess
around with something that is a possible safety risk and decided to call a
pro. The mechanic assured us that we
hadn't done anything wrong and that it is exceedingly rare to be able to remove
the valve without unseating the thru-hull as well.
This morning,
he came to our rescue, 24 hours before inspection and splash-down. To our surprise, he began by cutting into the
thru-hull seating from the OUTSIDE of the boat, which now makes perfect sense
to us. If you look at the bottom locking
ring on thru-hull fitting from the inside of the boat (that hexagonal ring at the
bottom of the thru-hull fitting now corroded to a light green in the photo above), there’s no way to get at it with a wrench
because it’s counter-sunk. The only way
to remove the assembly is to cut small sections in the outside ring, then take
a hammer and hefty screwdriver and peel away the little sections. Once that is done, the assembly can be
removed from the inside of the boat.
While the
mechanic took the assembly back to the shop to pry off and clean the elbow from the old
valve with more tools we don’t have, he loaned us a heat gun (having scoffed at
my hairdryer) and we were charged with extracting the top joint fitting from
the evacuation hose. After a startlingly
short time, I smelled burning rubber and before I could voice my concern,
Patrick cried victory.
![]() |
| Still smokin !! |
The rest
was relatively simple. The thru-hull was
fixed into the hole with a generous amount of Sika 291 and the new assembly was
screwed into place. This manoeuvre required
two people, though: one to screw the assembly from the inside of the boat and
another to hold and block the thru-hull fitting from the outside to keep it
from turning. The inside of the
thru-hull has two ridiculously small bumps that are supposed to help you grip and
hold the fitting, but we can report that they are only mildly useful. The last step is to reattach the to the
fitting and tighten down the hose clamps.
I was afraid that Patrick’s antics with the heat gun had deformed the
hose beyond repair but apparently it was used to such abuse.
The procedure
lasted 1.5 hours and cost about 160 Euros.
We’re thankful that it could be done in time for our rendez-vous with
the water tomorrow and we realize that even if we had known what to do, we didn't
have the tools to do it well. But next
time, I assured Patrick, we can try it ourselves. (Note to self: Christmas present for Pat is a
mega-wrench and a heat gun. Well, maybe just the wrench...)
Inspection
tomorrow !
Friday, 24 April 2015
The 2-boat Two-Step
Spray News
Old
joke:
Q: “What’s
worse than finding a worm in your apple?”
A: “Finding
half of a worm in your apple.”
My life
lately:
Q: “What’s
more stressful than not selling your old boat before buying a new one?”
A: “Selling your boat contingent on the results
of a 6-hour inspection.”
Yes, the good news is we have potential buyers for Spray. The stressful news is that the sale is contingent on a thorough inspection, both in and out of the water. Of course we know that Spray is in excellent shape and we have verified that everything is in working order (oh okay … there’s ONE sticky seacock in the toilet that we’re treating liberally with vinegar, but that usually does the trick.) But knowing that everything is ship-shape doesn’t stop me from waking up in the middle of the night wondering what an expert might find that would sink the deal. One more week of waiting and wondering…
Mareda News
The sail
maker finally agreed to agree with the rigging expert about the Code D furling line system earlier this week. This has
taken weeks to resolve. I’m now hopeful
that we’ll have a really nice system set up for light downwind sailing (e.g.,
bliss).
Our new
battle is over how to best rig the boom for a 3rd reef point on the
mainsail. In 2 years of sailing, we only
used the 3rd reef twice on Spray, and both times this situation lasted
less than 15 minutes before we went to bare poles. But still, heading off without a 3rd
reef seems a bit foolhardy. This means …heavy sigh…another round of slogging
through animated exchanges between the sail maker and the rigging specialist.
Did I
mention I just found a great new recipe for Ginger Mint Juleps? With everything else going on, I almost
forgot about the Derby!
Staying on
top of these things takes a LOT of time.
The dealer mentioned that a new Sun Odyssey 379 was coming to the
boatyard this week to be outfitted. The
owner lives in Paris. Patrick and I were
astounded that anyone could manage a boat from a distance like that. The dealer said, “Most people just order the
standard version and we don’t have any modifications to deal with.”
I hadn’t
thought about it, but we do seem to have a lot of special orders. Here are our non-standard modifications:
1. Code
D Gennaker + rigging hardware (including spinnaker pole)
2. 3rd
Reef in Mainsail + rigging hardware
3. Rocna
anchor and Kong-type articulated mooring shackle
4. 40
meters of chain (standard = 28m)
5. Cockpit
arch with 2 solar-panels and dinghy davits
6. Wireless
Internet antenna mounted on arch
7. Television and antenna
8. Electronic barometer / weather station
9. Duplexer to use VHF antenna for FM radio
reception
10. Tri-color navigation lights on top of mast
11. Rigging hardware for boom brake (boom
modifications and cleats)
I have
episodes of guilt-mixed-with-panic about how much this is all costing, but then
Patrick reminds me that we spend 6-7 months living full-time on the
boat. It’s not a vacation home, it’s our PRIMARY home. And maybe next
year we’ll even rent out the land-based home while we’re away to replenish the sailing
kitty. But that’s a headache for another
day.
Thursday, 16 April 2015
The Code D Conundrum
On Facebook,
I've been whining lately about our Code D problems. The Code D is a small (65 m2) furling
spinnaker that we’re having custom made for Mareda, which will allow us to have
sail power in light winds from about 60° off the bow to full downwind sailing
with a spinnaker pole. The problem is
not with the sail itself, but in choosing an appropriate tack point.
The Sun
Odyssey 379 comes with a reinforced tack point designed for an asymmetrical spinnaker. Perfect for the Code D, right?
“Right”,
says the rigging specialist.
“Wrong”, says the sail maker.
The furling
line, the line that goes around the furler drum of the Code D and allows you to
roll up the sail, is the problem. It’s
called a “continuous line” because it’s a single closed loop. It is typically very long to allow you to
reach back to the cockpit, but can quickly become a gnarly mess. According to the sail maker, the line must be
1) perfectly straight with no angles between the drum and the cockpit, and 2)
under permanent light tension to avoid kinks in the line. This all makes good sense. The problem is that the tack point on the SO
379, like most boats, is directly in front of the genoa furler, and there is no
way to lead the Code D furling line from the drum to the cockpit without going
slightly around the genoa furler,
creating an angle.
![]() |
| A furler drum and continuous line. |
Herein lies
the rub. Literally. The sail maker says the friction associated
with such an angle will cause the furling process to become too difficult. He says we must have a new stainless steel
tack point soldered onto the secondary bow davit, which will place the Code D
to the side of the genoa, rather than in front of it, and give us a straight
angle-free line between the furler and the cockpit.
The rigging
specialist says that this is baloney. (Oh, alright, he’s French and he didn't
say “baloney” but that’s what he meant.)
According to him, there are simple ways to reduce the angle and pieces
of rigging to reduce friction, such as the fancy little thing called a double fairlead,
made specifically to keep furler lines from tangling and kinking. When placed on one or more well-chosen
stanchions, the angle is minimized and the lines stay separated. In addition, a couple of cam cleats can be used
to block the line in place and to keep it under tension.
![]() |
| Double fairleads on the stanchions to avoid tangling. |
![]() |
| Cam cleats to block the line and keep it under tension. Photo from Doane's Sail Magazine article, 2012. |
We mentioned
this to the sail maker. He said “I’ve
seen it a hundred times and it never works.”
I've
searched the sailing forums in both French and English to find threads that
discuss problems with gennaker furlers and haven’t been able to find anything
that suggests people are having difficulties with the continuous furling line. I've looked at videos showing furling
spinnakers, gennakers, and code sails, and they all seem to use the system
described by the rigging specialist. The
principle rigging companies, Selden and Facnor, both suggest using double
fairleads and jammers.
We sent a
video to the sail maker. He said “I
don’t trust videos.”
And no one
seems to be able to show us an example of this set-up that either does or does
not work.
Anyone out
there have experience with this ???
Charles Doane has a nice article in Sail Magazine from 2012 that
addresses many of these issues, but I’m sure our sail maker would simply say “I don’t
trust magazine articles.”
Thursday, 2 April 2015
From the ground up
Now that
Mareda has arrived (!!), the outfitting has begun in
earnest, and we have to make some firm decisions about equipment. This is in stark contrast to the decisions we've
made up to this point, which mostly involved flipping through the catalog and
saying “Cool ! Let’s add one of these !”
**note: I'm taking lots of photos of the commissioning process. See our Facebook page for all the latest photos and updates !
Starting
from the ground up, we've been thinking about anchors and chains this week.
The
standard offer for the SO 379 was a 16kg Delta anchor with 28 meters of 10 mm
chain and 40 meters of 18mm line.
(That’s a ~ 33 lb anchor, ~ 85 feet of 3/8” chain and ~120 feet of line). This all seemed a bit light to us, especially
for anchoring in the meteorologically-capricious Mediterranean. At one point, I tried to convince myself that
with a swing-keel we could get closer to shore and wouldn't need so much chain,
but for reasons I can’t quite put my finger on, I decided that this was dumb.
From technical
reviews and personal testimonies of friends, we knew we wanted a Rocna anchor. With Mareda's length of 11.3 meters and weight at just under 7 tonnes, the Rocna sizing charts suggested that an anchor of 15kg
would be adequate (where “adequate” is based on tests in 50 knot winds with
associated surge and poor holding conditions).
The chart indicated that 8 mm chain would suffice for our boat with such
a Rocna anchor. For the SO 379, 10mm chain
and windlass is standard, so we felt good about being over-spec’d (if that is,
indeed, the case).
But no one
said anything about the length of chain required. The basic rule (which of course has many
variations) is that you want to put out a length of chain that is 4 times
greater than the water depth at high-tide.
(Example: moor in 3 meters of water, put out 12 meters of chain). This all depends, of course, on the
conditions in which you anchor. An
interesting rule-of-thumb I saw recently: winds of Beaufort 3 = 3 x chain length; winds of Beaufort 4 = 4 x chain
length, etc., etc.
After
searching through numerous web-sites and talking to friends who know the Med
well, we decided that 40 meters of chain was the minimum for the Med. If 40m is minimum, I thought, why not go for
50, just to be safe? When I mentioned
this to Patrick, he turned on his best sarcastic voice and said, “Yeah, great ! and Hey! Why not 60?
Why not 75? What the heck… let’s
make it an even 100 !”
Slinking
back to my office, I started thinking about it.
Why not more? That’s when it
dawned on me that there must be limits, real limits, based on weight (and not
on snitty, financially-motivated comments from one’s husband). How much does all that chain weigh? When does your boat start to become nose-heavy? And what about the windlass? If you've deployed 100m of 10mm chain, is
your windlass strong enough to pull it up?
Easy stuff
first. 10 mm chain weighs 2.25 kg /
meter, giving us 112.5 kg for 50 meters.
Medium
stuff next: The windlass (Quick Aires
1000 W) has a working load of 120 kg.
Its maximum working load is more than double this, but we don’t like
pushing electrical / mechanical devices into the red zone, do we? So 50 meters of 10mm chain is getting quite
close to the working load. Add a 15 kg
anchor and we've gone past it. Granted,
the situation where you would have 50 meters of chain and the anchor hanging
through the water column all at once is rare and you could push the beast hard
for a short period of time, but you just never know, do you?
Hard stuff
now: When does the boat start to get too
nose heavy? As with most hard questions
in life, the difficulty lies in defining the question. What does too
nose-heavy mean? The only advice I could
find on this was “sail the boat with the
weight in the nose, then move the weight to the center of the boat and see if
she sails better.” Humph.
I’m still a
bit at a loss as to how to approach this one.
The standard equipment for the SO 379 gives 79 kg versus the 112.5kg we
want. The difference is peanuts, right? Let’s just assume (because I like the answer
I get when I do this) that the architects have given us a safety or performance margin of 2
relative to the standard weight they propose, which means that we could go up to
158 kg without getting too nose heavy.
Since we’ll be well under this mark even with 40 meters of 18mm line
attached to the chain, all’s well. With
time, I’ll convince myself that I feel comfortable with this.
In the end,
we decided to go with 40m of chain and 40m of line. Patrick triumphantly pointed out that this
was the decision we had come to before I did all these calculations. But what
else was I supposed to do with a cold rainy afternoon? (I’ve had other rainy-day inspired fits of
calculations, including rudder angles and hull speed. It rains A LOT in Brittany…)
So our
principal mooring will look like this:
- Rocna 15kg anchor
- Articulated Kong junction between the anchor and the chain
- 40 meters of 10mm chain
- 40 meters of 18 mm line, connected to the chain with a splice directly onto the chain (if the 18mm strands fit through the 10mm chain links… to be determined shortly).
- A double bow roller, which the Jeanneau dealer says has been reinforced after the first models had problems.
- A snubber
- Depth marks on the chain and an “aide memoire” of what the marks mean in the anchor locker. I think I’ll stick with my spray-paint technique. You have to re-apply the paint every year, but it’s quick and easy to do.
- The 2nd anchor: a 12 kg FOB with 10 meters of 8mm chain + 20 meters of lead line. I’ll attach another 20 meters of line to that when we go into the Med. After 2 years of sailing around northern France, the Channel Islands, and northern Spain, we've never needed the 2nd anchor, but then again, we've never had a boat we could beach before, either !
![]() |
| Our high-tech chain depth indicator system. |
![]() |
| Our memory aid of what those colors mean ! |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

































